How To Prove Various Evidence In Court


Witnesses cannot be evaluated under one common parameter to deduce conclusions towards oneself as they vary based on their circumstances. It would be wrong to evaluate eye-witness in the same way as the interested witness. The Supreme Court has ruled that the evidence of an interested witness is the kind of evidence of which the source is likely to be tainted. The person concerned must have some direct interest in seeing that the accused person is somehow or other convicted because he has some animosity against the accused or for some other reason, while eye-witness is the eyes and ears of justice. Eye-witness account requires careful independent assessment and evaluation for their credibility, which should not be adversely prejudged, making medical, or any other evidence the sole touchstone for the test of such credibility. Click here to Readmore

Related Articles


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *